CivilDocketKnowledge Centre
← Library
Official guidance Official service

Family mediation

Government of Ontario

Source sectionOverview; when mediation may be used; related dispute-resolution options
Source checked2026-08-07
VersionUpdated December 19, 2025
Related explanation
Resolution

Family mediation

Court: Ontario family courts — court-specific procedure may differ

Mediation is a voluntary dispute-resolution process in which a neutral mediator helps the parties try to reach their own agreement.

In family mediation, a neutral mediator helps the parties identify issues, exchange information and explore possible agreements. The mediator does not decide the case and does not act as either party’s lawyer. Mediation can address parenting, support, property and other family issues when the process is appropriate.

Mediation is not suitable in every situation. Screening for family violence, coercion and power imbalance is an important part of family dispute resolution. Even when mediation produces a proposed settlement, each party may need independent legal advice and the agreement should be properly documented before relying on it as a final resolution.

Source summary

What this source covers

Official Ontario information describing family mediation as an out-of-court dispute-resolution process and explaining when it can be used during separation, divorce, or a court case.

For exact wording, dates, exceptions and current requirements, read the original source. Binding law and court directions take priority over explanatory material.

Open the official source ↗
Law and rules

Related official provisions

Rule 43 — allows parties to choose a Binding Judicial Dispute Resolution (JDR) as a summary process to resolve a family dispute instead of a trial. Through Binding JDR, parties ask the same judge to assist in settling their issues on consent and to make final orders about unresolved issues in a single hearing. Prior to the Binding JDR proceeding, the parties must sign a request and consent form and obtain the approval of the court.

A Binding JDR hearing includes both settlement and adjudication. The judge conducting the Binding JDR hearing will explore possibilities for resolution with the parties. As in any court proceeding, the judge conducting the Binding JDR hearing has an oversight role and must approve any terms of settlement. For issues that cannot be resolved on consent, the judge will hear submissions from the parties about the orders they seek. The judge may ask the parties questions and request additional information, if necessary, to reach an informed and fair decision. The parties do not have an automatic right to call or cross-examine witnesses at a Binding JDR hearing. At the conclusion of the Binding JDR hearing, the judge will provide a final order on the issues, including those that have been resolved on consent.

Ontario Superior Court of JusticeSuperior Court of Justice — province-wide
Open official source ↗

Rule 17 — (7.1) allows parties to make this request after they have tried to resolve the issues that are in dispute through mediation or a Legal Aid Ontario settlement conference, provided the parties confirm:

The dispute resolution process included a screening for power imbalances and domestic violence; No motions for a temporary order in the case are pending or are contemplated; and Financial disclosure has been provided. Counsel or parties make this request by filing a Form 14B: Motion and a Form 17G: Certificate of Dispute Resolution from each party addressing the above requirements. If the court grants permission, the parties are expected to comply with all requirements relating to a settlement conference, including filing a Form 17C: Settlement Conference Brief and any additional documentation (for example, a Net Family Property Statement, Comparative Net Family Statement, litigation expert reports or Offers to Settle).…

Ontario Superior Court of JusticeSuperior Court of Justice — province-wide
Open official source ↗

Rule 43 — BINDING JUDICIAL DISPUTE RESOLUTION IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF JUSTICE

43. Binding judicial dispute resolution Table of forms Browse or search laws How to use e-Laws Glossary Legislative tables Search within this documentSearch within this documentSubmit Use exact search How do I build my search term?Use these search operators to perform more specific searches and narrow down your results. See how to use e-Laws for more detailed descriptions on search operators. Operator Example Function No operator Human rights Searches for documents containing all of your specified search terms. AND Human AND rights Same as using no operator. “x y z” (quotes) “Human rights” Searches for a multi-word phrase that contains all the search terms, in that order. OR engineer OR architect Searches for documents containing 1 or more of the specified terms. NOT insurance NOT funds Excludes a word from your search. /# fishing /4 hunting Specifies how many words are allowed between the 2 search terms. This is called a proximity search. ? licen?e Searches for terms with an interchangeable character. Replace the interchangeable character with a question mark.…

Government of OntarioO. Reg. 114/99
Open official source ↗

Part J — : Binding Judicial Dispute Resolution (Rule 43)

On January 22, 2025, the Family Law Rules were amended to add Rule 43: Binding Judicial Dispute Resolution in the Superior Court of Justice. Rule 43 replaces the Practice Advisory Concerning the Superior Court of Justice’s Binding Judicial Dispute Resolution Pilot Project (introduced on May 14, 2021) which is no longer in effect.

Ontario Superior Court of JusticeSuperior Court of Justice — province-wide
Open official source ↗

Part 4 — – FAMILY PROCEEDINGS A. Mediation and other Court-Connected Resources

B. Automatic Orders C. Motions to Change D. Early Case Conferences – Milton Only E. Dispute Resolution Officer (DRO) Program F. Case Conferences Scheduling & Filing APPLICABLE TO ALL CENTRAL WEST CASE CONFERENCES Case Conference Briefs (Max. 8 pages) Requirement to Confer and Make Disclosure PRIOR to Case Conference Confirmation Form Proceed to a Settlement Conference G. Settlement Conferences (Max. 12 pages) Scheduling Settlement Conferences Directions for Settlement Conferences H. Trial Management Conferences (TMC) FAMILY ASSIGNMENT COURT AND A TMC IN BRAMPTON

Ontario Superior Court of JusticeSuperior Court of Justice — Central West
Open official source ↗

Rule 1.3 — of the Family Law Rules requires a member of the public to give 10 days’ written notice to the parties before the member of the public may access a family court file involving:

Decision-making responsibility, parenting time or contact with respect to a child under the Divorce Act or Part III of the Children’s Law Reform Act ; Orders under Part I of the Children’s Law Reform Act (parentage); or International child abduction. The member of the public must also send notice to the Children’s Lawyer if the Children’s Lawyer is representing a child in the case or conducting an investigation for the court. After receiving notice, a party who wishes to restrict access to the file has 10 days to file a 14B motion. If such a motion is brought, court staff may refuse the requested access until the court decides the motion. Before the member of the public is granted access to the file, they must file an affidavit (Form 14A) confirming 1) the date on which they gave notice under Rule 1.3, to whom and by what method; and 2) that they have not been served with a motion for a restricted access order. The following persons are exempt from the notice requirement under Family Court Rule 1.3: A party or their counsel;…

Ontario Superior Court of JusticeSuperior Court of Justice — province-wide
Open official source ↗
Related subjects:Settlement and resolution · Agreements and dispute resolution
Further reading

Related rules, forms and explanations

Binding official sourceLaw / rule

Family Law Act

Official Ontario statute addressing family property and equalization, support, domestic contracts and related family-law matters.

Government of OntarioFull ActSource checked 2026-08-07